Essence of Red by Kai Z Feng for Vogue China

Essence of Red by Kai Z Feng for Vogue China

 
I told you Red is hot in the Van Cleef post.
 
The People Republic of China turns 60th on the 1st of October and the Vogue China cover goes red : hip model Liu Wen features in a serie named ‘The Essence of Red’ photographed by Kai Z Feng in looks from Prada, Fendi, Nina Ricci, Alexander McQueen…and Christian Louboutin red velvet suede shoes (on pic)
 
This is what I call politically correct fashion and media positioning by Condenast : China Vogue and the Hunt of October Red ?…
 
 
 
 
How far would you go? Katie Cassidy in Live! © Pretty pictures

How far would you go? Katie Cassidy in Live! © Pretty pictures

 

ZeroSocialMedia, one agency blog about Social Media in China, published an interesting post in extent to one I had previously read on Mashable on how social media contribute to enhance individualism. People belonging to what is called now “Generation Me” are using such tools for ”self-promotion, narcissism and attention”

To understand this phenomenon, we have to look at our era largely influenced by media evolution trends coupled with wild capitalism in most places of the world.

Let’s simplify the mechanism and create a chain :

Technology and equipment development > devices multiplication >production costs decrease > communication speed increase. Then we witness the emergence of UGC (User Generated Content) a fabulous model in which people create content for free and offer it at anyone’s – or almost, disposal. By using UGC and triggering Egos, media manage to make profits with low costs programs for satisfying the hunger of wide audience.

Reality TV and talk shows are the exact reflection of Generation Me. Unsignificant people are encouraged to provide more “individual content” and get rewarded with money or pseudo-fame.  The easier it is to upload and broadcast content, the more individualism strenghtens. 

Someone working at a high position in a very big media corporation recently told me proudly about his job ”We are creating dreams“. “In fact, you are creating illusions” I replied, “You can fool the audience, but don’t fool yourself my friend.”

This makes me think about latin “Panem et Circem”. To maintain peace,  people must be feeded with bread and entertained with games. As entertainment has become the new opium of the masses, our societies are providing more efforts to entertain masses rather than feeding people with much needed resources.

Getting back on the subject, China has always been focusing on its unity, from unification of the territory and of Chinese language two thousands years ago until the “One World, One Dream” slogan for Beijing Olympics. At some point, contradictions will emerge between “Generation Me” and “Generation We”, their parents and grandparents who lived a totally different era and shared dramatically different values.

Seems like the letters are reversing and the society evolving…towards what exactly?

 

 

Armwrestling in Bricklane by Fabbio

Armwrestling in Bricklane by Fabbio

 

 

 

This morning I had a meeting with a marketing agency. The guy started to introduce his service (offline) and thought it was a good idea to sell it vs online. He began by saying something like “Online is not a reliable channel for word of mouth, you cannot track as accurately as you can with offline.” Well, as a matter of fact, you do and after I made my point his attitude slightly changed. 

That makes me wonder why offline is still trying to compete with online instead of working together on cross channels integrated strategies.

 

Let’s take the example in the media industry in the last couple of years - where wars are still raging today.

 

It is surprising to see how big companies waited such a long time before adopting a decent online strategy. Generation gaps, staying in control, misunderstandings : so many excuses…

Some were struggling to keep their power instead of giving in and learning, and most were pulling away. Disastrous decisions were taken as the offline was trying to replicate its model online instead of adapting to multi devices.

 

I remember in my previous company how “regular” journalists were despising bloggers and web writers. Web teams were having more pressure than the magazine because we were considered less “legitimate”. I also remember when numbers showed up, and how journalists started seeking online positions afterwards.

 For the web, it has certainly contributed to challenge the people. What about the offline world? What did it learn from that defensive behavior?

This is how some media companies lost their ability to innovate to the advantage of start ups and small agencies where talents were focusing on coupling technology to content.

 

Today, I am surprise to see how many career executive with offline backgrounds are holding or actively seeking key positions in the online industry today. I meet people everyday who think because they follow a couple blogs they will be able to switch careers. Maybe some will, but let’s be honest : do we need another economic disaster to make us realize we need to work on a meritocratic model and hire the right people for the right jobs?

 Peace xx